Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2017 DAILYLAW 3613 (PNJ)

AZAD SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

CWP/14224/2017 · 2026-08-26

Harsimran Singh Sethi, Minderjeet Yadav

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- CWP- 14224-2017 (O&M) and other connected matters IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 CWP-14224-2017(O&M) Decided on. 26.08.2026 AZAD SINGH ….PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ….RESPONDENTS 103 CWP-14812-2017 (O&M) PARVEEN KUMAR AND OTHERS ….PETITIONERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ….RESPONDENTS 104 CWP-14819-2017 (O&M) RAM NARAIN PRUTHI ….PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ….RESPONDENTS 105 CWP-15951-2017 (O&M) DHARAMBIR SINGH ….PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ….RESPONDENTS 106 CWP-23474-2017 (O&M) RAKHA RAM & ORS ….PETITIONERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ….RESPONDENTS POONAM 2026.09.01 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP- 108 CWP-13311-2019(O&M) NEELIMA DAHIYA AND ORS ….PETITIONERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ….RESPONDENTS 109 CWP-15564-2019(O&M) BRIJ PAL SINGH ….PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ….RESPONDENTS 110 CWP-24727-2019 (O&M) CHANDER HAS AND OTHERS ….PETITIONERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ….RESPONDENTS CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MINDERJEET YADAV Present: Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-14224-2017. Mr. Ram Verma, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-14812-2017 and CWP-14819-2017. Mr. S.K. Redhu, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-15951-2017. Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-23474-2017. Ms. Anu Pal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition has already been decided by Full Bench while passing the order in CWP-17310-2015 titled as Shamsher POONAM 2026.09.01 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -3- CWP- 14224-2017 (O&M) and other connected matters Singh and Ors. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Hence, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in the same terms and conditions. 2. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case wherein the question of law raised has already been answered by Full Bench while passing the order in ‘ Shamsher Singh’s case (supra), hence, the present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms and conditions. 3. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 26.08.2026 (MINDERJEET YADAV) poonam JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No POONAM 2026.09.01 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document