CRM-M-30929 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (137) PARVEEN AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. AG, Haryana Ms. Neha Rani, Advocate for respondent No.2 MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of FIR No. 702 dated 26.12.2017 registered under Sections 506, 427, 379, 323, 149 and 148 of IPC at Police Station City Narnaul, D Mahendergarh on the basis of compromise dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P 2. This Court vide order dated 27.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their the learned Magistrate was directed to send his report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 30929-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : 22.07.2026 PARVEEN AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. AG, Haryana Ms. Neha Rani, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of 702 dated 26.12.2017 registered under Sections 506, 427, 379, 323, 149 and 148 of IPC at Police Station City Narnaul, D along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 27.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their the learned Magistrate was directed to send his report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-30929-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.07.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. AG, Haryana Ms. Neha Rani, Advocate for respondent No.2 The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of 702 dated 26.12.2017 registered under Sections 506, 427, 379, 323, 149 and 148 of IPC at Police Station City Narnaul, District along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 27.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his report qua the genuineness AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.22 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-30929 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Narnaul and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 18.07.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the part 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versu 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. under Sections 506, City Narnaul, District Mahendergarh proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P 22.07.2026 Amit Sharma 30929-2026 (O&M) (1) Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Narnaul and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 18.07.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the part In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC , this petition is allowed and FIR No. 702 dated 26.12.2017 registered under Sections 506, 427, 379, 323, 149 and 148 of IPC at Police Station City Narnaul, District Mahendergarh along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. (MANISHA BATR Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Narnaul and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 18.07.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this s State of Punjab and another and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 702 dated 26.12.2017 registered 427, 379, 323, 149 and 148 of IPC at Police Station along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated are quashed qua the petitioners. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.22 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.