230-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10226-2017 Decided on : July 13, 2026 THE KHANNA CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD. . . . Petitioner Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL LUDHIANA AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Manav Bajaj, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sharwan Sehgal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that, as per the information received by him, respondent No.2 has already expired and, despite best efforts, no one has approached him for moving an appropriate application to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.2. He, therefore, pleads no instructions. 2. In these circumstances, this Court is unable to proceed further with the hearing of the present petition and is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for want of prosecution. Therefore, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. However, liberty is granted to the parties to revive the present petition within a period of four weeks from today, in case any substantive issue still subsists alongwith a cause of action. (KIRTI SINGH) July 13, 2026 JUDGE Ritika Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RITIKA 2026.07.18 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh