230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26056-2017 Decided on : July 08, 2026 ANIL KUMAR YADAV . . . Petitioner Versus PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT-11 GURGRAM AND ORS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: None for the petitioner. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Even on the previous dates of hearing i.e. 26.09.2022 and 27.11.2025, none was appeared on behalf of petitioner. 3. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 5. Pending application(s), if any, is/are also disposed of. (KIRTI SINGH) July 08, 2026 JUDGE Ritika Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RITIKA 2026.07.10 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh