SOHAN LAL SHARMA AND ORS. v. SURENDER KUMAR AND ORS.
FAO/7526/2017 · 2026-07-09
G C Garg Retd
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3422 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3422 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 235
FAO-7526-2017 (O&M) Decided on :21.10.2024 Sohan Lal Sharma and others . . . Appellants Versus Surender Kumar and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: None for the appellants. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
1. As per the report of the registry, notice could not be issued to respondents as process fee has not been filed.
2. None has appeared on behalf of the appellants to inform the Court as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Liberty is granted to the appellants to revive the appeal, in case, any cause of action survives.
4. Registry is directed to send the copy of the present order to the appellants on the address mentioned in the memo of parties.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE 21.10.2024 Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No MEHAK HURIA 2024.10.22 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment