GRAM PANCHAYAT MATRODA v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS.
CWP/23286/2017 · 2026-07-02
Pankaj Jain
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3418 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3418 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
225
Gram Panchayat Matorda
...... Petitioner versus Financial Commissioner, Department of Rural Development & Panchayats & ors.
..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Mr. Harkirat Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.P.S.Ishar, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate and Ms. Sumitra, Advocate for respondent No.3. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
By way of the present writ petition, the Gram Panchayat had impugned the order dated 16.02.2017 (Annexure P-5) whereby the Panchayat resolution dated 13.09.2015 was ordered to be set aside. 2
As per the counsel for the petitioner, during the pendency of the present writ petition, the Gram Panchayat has resolved to comply with the impugned order. He, therefore, submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3
Ordered accordingly.
( PANKAJ JAIN ) 02.07.2026
JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.04 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document