IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Attero Recycling Private Limited State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : D for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Additional DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition was directed against the show cause notice but after filing of this petition the final order passed under Section 130 of C Service Tax Act, 2017 has been served upon the petitioner and therefore, he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the afore order. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. May 21, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.175 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13794 Date of Decision : Attero Recycling Private Limited Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Dr. Avinash Poddar, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition was directed against the show cause notice but after filing of this petition the final order passed under Section 130 of C Act, 2017 has been served upon the petitioner and therefore, he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the afore Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 13794-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI r, Advocate (through VC) Advocate General, Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition was directed against the show cause notice but after filing of this petition the final order passed under Section 130 of Central Goods and Act, 2017 has been served upon the petitioner and therefore, he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the afore Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.05.22 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document