Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2017 DAILYLAW 3383 (PNJ)

SARJEET v. AMIT KUMAR AND ORS

FAO/8086/2017 · 2026-05-12

Vikas Bahl

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 FAO No.8086 of 2017 Date of decision: May 12th, 2026 Sarjeet .....Appellant Versus Amit Kumar and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Neeraj, Advocate for Mr. Arvind Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant is not aware as to what happened in the mediation proceedings in spite of the specific order passed by this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in view of the same, present appeal be disposed of but liberty be granted to the appellant to revive the same after confirming as to what had happened in the mediation proceedings. 3. Disposed of with aforesaid liberty. May 12th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.05.13 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh