IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 (I) CWP-25094-2017 Date of Decision : May 20, 2026 THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER (T), MEHAM ROAD, BHIWANI -PETITIONER V/S SATTAL AND ANOTHER -RESPONDENTS (II) CWP-6092-2017 SATTAL -PETITIONER V/S PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, HISAR AND ANOTHER -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana for the petitioner (in CWP-25094-2017) and for the respondent no.2 (in CWP-6092-2017). Mr. Shokeen Singh Verma, Advocate, with Ms. Neha Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner (in CWP-6092-2017) and for the respondent no.1 (in CWP-25094-2017). *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Both these writ petitions are amenable for being decided through a common verdict on account of their being instituted by the same management and workman against a common award passed by the Industrial Tribunal. 2. It is apposite to record that during the pendency of these writ petitions, the workman was reinstated by the management and has, in the interregnum, retired from service upon attaining the age of superannuation. DEVINDER YADAV 2026.05.22 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-25094-2017 AND CWP-6092-2017 2 3. In view of the supervening events, learned counsel appearing for the respective parties jointly submit that they do not wish to press these writ petitions. 4. Consequently, both these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed. 5. A photocopy of this order be placed on file of connected case. (KULDEEP TIWARI) May 20, 2026 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.05.22 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment