[207] Jasbir Sing Kundan Sin Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] 30.08.2017 respondent limit from P of this Cou [2] IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-282 Date of De r Singh and others versus an Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate fo Mr. N.S. Lucky, Advocate for **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The petitioners allege willful .2017 passed by this Court in RSA ndent having mortgaged the propert from Punjab National Bank are guilty s Court. Order dated 30.08.2017 reads a “CM-10585-C-2017 For the reasons record Document Annexures A-1 to A RSA-4098-2017 (O&M) Heard. Admitted. Status-quo regarding po T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 2829-2021 (O&M) of Decision : 21.04.2026 …Petitioners ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN cate for the petitioners. for the respondent. willful disobedience of Order dated RSA-4098-2017, claiming that the roperty in question, to avail credit guilty of having committed contempt reads as under:- corded, the application is allowed. to A-4 are taken on record. possession be maintained.” dated t the credit tempt ed. RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.22 18:12 I agree to specified portions of this document COCP-2829-2021 (O&M) -2- [3] Evidently, this Court ordered the parties to maintain status quo only regarding possession. There was no injunction granted restraining respondent from mortgaging the property by deposit of title deeds. There is no allegation with respect to disturbance in possession of suit property as it stood on 30.08.2017. Thus, this Court finds no reason to hold that the respondent has violated the orders passed by this Court. [4] Finding no merit in the present contempt petition. The same is ordered to be dismissed. [5] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 21.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.22 18:12 I agree to specified portions of this document