Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2017 DAILYLAW 3296 (PNJ)

MS MAHADEV STEEL ENTERPRISES v. UNION OF INDIA

CWP/9930/2026 · 2026-04-06

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT M/s Mahadev Steel Enterprises Union of India and another CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioner Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate, and Mr. Parth for the respondents. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel petition to enable the petitioner to avail its remedy under Section 3 Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. In case the petitioner avails of the remedy, liberty for which has been sought and got through the instant order, we have no doubt that the competent authority shall dispose of the same expeditiously, in with law. April 06, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.149 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9930 Date of Decision : M/s Mahadev Steel Enterprises Versus Union of India and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate, or the petitioner. Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate, and Mr. Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner to enable the petitioner to avail its remedy under Section 3 oods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. In case the petitioner avails of the remedy, liberty for which sought and got through the instant order, we have no doubt that the competent authority shall dispose of the same expeditiously, in (DEEPAK JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9930-2026 Date of Decision : 06.04.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this to enable the petitioner to avail its remedy under Section 30 of Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. In case the petitioner avails of the remedy, liberty for which sought and got through the instant order, we have no doubt that the competent authority shall dispose of the same expeditiously, in accordance DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.04.08 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document