(1) 45-WP-8192-2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 8192/2017 RAISAHEB REKHCHAND MOHOTA SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD. THR. DY. GENERAL MANAGER SHRI. P.W. HARNE VS THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, HINGANGHAT, THR. CHIEF OFFICER AND ANOTHER WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 172/2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8192/2017 M/S. JAIN ASSOCIATES, HINGANGHAT, THR. PROPRIETOR, SHRI. DHANRAJ PANNALAL CHOPDA VS RAISAHEB REKHCHAND MOHOTA SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD. THR. DY. GENERAL MANAGER, P.W. HARNE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Jatin Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner (s)/Applicant (s). Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Advocate for the Petitioner (s) in CP/172/2021. Mr. Rozat Akolawala, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. Raghav Bhardarkar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2026. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2736/2025 1. The amendment has been not carried out despite the order dated 03.09.2026. We grant two more working days, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed for non-compliance with the order. 2. Once the amendment is carried out, issue notice to the respondent(s), returnable on 17.09.2026. 3. The petitioner shall serve the newly added respondent by all permissible modes, including service by Speed Post A/d, and shall file an affidavit of service. Kartikeya 2026:BHC-NAG:12107-DB (2) 45-WP-8192-2017 4. It is but natural that the petitioner shall make the Directors responsible for disclosing the assets of the Company in the CIRP proceedings as party respondents. 5. The petitioner shall also explain as to why the then RP has been not made party respondent. 6. With this clarification, the application is disposed of. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAN) NO. 82/2026 7. Leave to amend the petition is granted as regards the names of the respondents to be added in the contempt proceedings. 8. The amendment shall be carried out before the next date. 9. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 172/2021 10. Leave to correct the nomenclature of both the respondents and to furnish correct address of Respondent No.2 is granted. 11. Amendment shall be carried within two working days. 12. List on 17.09.2026. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kartikeya