PRAMILA SHIVAJIRAO YELLULWAD v. SHIVAJIRAO ARJUNRAO YELLULWAD
CA/4392/2019 · 2026-09-03
Civil Appealbody2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3253 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3253 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 951- F.C.A. No. 25 of 2017.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4392 OF 2019 IN FCA/25/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5415 OF 2019 IN FCA/25/2017 PRAMILA SHIVAJIRAO YELLULWAD ….Appellant VERSUS SHIVAJIRAO ARJUNRAO YELLULWAD …..Respondent ….. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Aniket V. Wadwale h/f Mr. A.M. Gaikwad .....
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2026
ORDER:-
1. Though on the last occasion the learned counsel for the respondent/husband had undertaken to supply the address of appellant/wife, but even the notice was issued to her on Court motion on the address supplied by her only. It is the duty of the appellant to furnish her current address, if she resides to that place. No such address is filed by the appellant and despite knowing that she has filed this appeal, she remained absent.
(2) 951- F.C.A. No. 25 of 2017.odt
2. In view of the same, it appears that she is not interested in prosecuting with this appeal and it stands dismissed for default, along with the pending civil applications.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/