IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 232 Satjit Singh Kamaljit Singh and another CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mohit Sain, Advocate Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate f VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The judgment dated 22.09.2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 04.04.2014 passed by the J acquitting respondents No.1 448, 506, 411 of the 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that despite best efforts, they are not in a position to contact the petitioner. He further contends that the present petition be dismissed for non prosecution. 3. In view of the above, the p prosecution. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 13.02.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-3478 Date of decision: VERSUS Kamaljit Singh and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Mohit Sain, Advocate for Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the petitioner ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been dated 22.09.2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 04.04.2014 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana respondents No.1 of the charges framed under Sections 454, 380, 448, 506, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was dismissed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that despite best efforts, they are not in a position to contact the petitioner. He further contends that the present petition be dismissed for non In view of the above, the present petition is Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3478-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ or the petitioner. has been preferred against the dated 22.09.2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment udicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana of the charges framed under Sections 454, 380, was dismissed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that despite best efforts, they are not in a position to contact the petitioner. He further contends that the present petition be dismissed for non- resent petition is dismissed for non- Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.16 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document