Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2017 DAILYLAW 3207 (BOM)
SOU. BHARATI W/O RAJSINGH THAKUR v. THE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, AMRAVATI AND OTHERS
WP/457/2017 · 2026-08-29
body2017
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3207 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3207 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 wp 457.17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 457 OF 2017 ( Sau. Bharati w/o Rajsingh Thakur ..vs.. The Education Officer (Secondary), ZP, Amravati and others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. P.A. Jibhkate, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.A. Ashirgade, Addl.G.P for respondent No1.
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
DATED : 29 th AUGUST, 2026
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayers made in the petition have been answered and, therefore, nothing survives for further consideration.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Nivedita P. Mehta, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) adgokar 2026:BHC-NAG:11309-DB Signed by: MR. P.M. ADGOKAR Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 29/08/2026 15:08:26