Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 3202 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER v. VENKAT BHAGWAN MUSANE

CA/7302/2013 · 2026-08-21

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19-FA-4635-2017.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 19 FIRST APPEAL NO. 4635 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7302 OF 2013 IN FA/4635/2017 The State Of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Venkat Bhagwan Musane ...... Mr. B.A. Shinde, AGP for Appellants-State Mr. H.B. Nandgavale, Advocate h/f Mr. V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate for Respondent-Claimant ...... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 21 AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant/State. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant assail the Judgment and award dated 23.07.2012 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Udgir in L.A.R. No.826 of 2010 (Old L.A.R. No.591/2005). 3. Learned AGP appearing for the appellant-State as well as learned counsel for the respondent-claimant submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014 /Prak.Kra.4 /Bham-1 /A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with 2026:BHC-AUG:38306 19-FA-4635-2017.odt 2 Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. The Claimant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. 7. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE S P Rane