GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER v. PRITAM KAUR AND ORS
RFA/1899/2017 · 2026-02-25
Harkesh Manuja
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3171 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 3171 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.1899 of 2017(O&M) With XOBJR-43-2021(O&M)
And XOBJR-23-C1-2018(O&M) Date of Decision:-25.02.2026
......Appellant
Vs.
Pritam Kaur and others
.....Respondents Coram:-Hon'ble Mr. Harkesh Manuja
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
CM-4615-C1-2021 in XOBJR-23-C1-2018 & CM-1701-C1-2024 in XOBJR-43-2021.
For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The persons mentioned in para No.3 of the applications are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of deceased Cross Objector/Respondent No.2-Darshan Singh who had expired on 27.05.2018 and Respondent No.7-Kartar Kaur who had expired on 01.09.2021. Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
PAWAN KUMAR 2026.03.17 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Main Case
(HARKESH MANUJA) 25.02.2026 JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.03.17 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document