Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 3143 (BOM)

OMPRAKASH LAKHANLAL SABLE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/10395/2017 · 2026-08-18

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) wp10395.17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 WRIT PETITION NO. 10395 OF 2017 OMPRAKASH LAKHANLAL SABLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. Mahesh P. Kale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Wani, AGP for the respondent-State. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 18.08.2026 PC :- 01. In the present petition, challenge has been raised to certain causes of the Government Resolution dated 07.08.2012, viz. Clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7. This Court has already dealt with the said Government Resolution in a group of writ petitions, including Writ Petition No. 6549 of 2026 dated 30.07.2026. This Court has held these clauses to be valid and has refused to interfere with the Government Resolution. It is seen that the present petition is squarely covered by the said judgment. 02. Considering above, this petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. 2026:BHC-AUG:37141-DB ( 2 ) wp10395.17 03. Since, in the aforesaid group of petitions, this Court had directed the interim relief to continue for a period of six weeks, interim arrangement in the present petition shall also continue for a period of six weeks from today. [JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2026/Aug26/wp10395.17