297.17CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 297 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9437 OF 2015 CAPTION RAOSAHEB DAYARAM SURYAWANSHI VERSUS MS SAYANTANI JAFA ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.S.J.Salgare … CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J. DATE : 25.08.2026 P.C. : 1] The learned Advocate for the petitioner is elevated as High Court Judge. 2] The affidavit-in-reply is filed by the sole respondent, which indicates that the order under contempt is complied with and the pensionary benefits are granted to the petitioner. Hence, the order under contempt is complied with. 3] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:38540