226 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR-219-CII-2017 (O&M) IN CR-8746-2016 Date of Decision : 28.01.2026 Balkar Singh ... Appellant(s) Versus Rashpal Singh ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Esh Gupta, Advocate and Ms. Sarika Gupta, Advocate for the review applicant-petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate for the respondent. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. The present review application has been filed by the review applicant-petitioner for review of the order dated 21.09.2017 passed in CR-8746-2016. 2. While disposing off the main revision petition being CR-8746-2016, it was observed by the Court on 21.09.2017 that “…… By way of the impugned order dated 24.10.2016, the learned trial court rightly granted two months’ more time to the decree-holder to deposit the balance sale consideration.”. 3. Now the present review application being RA-CR-219-CII-2017 has been filed by the applicant-petitioner. In the garb of the present review application, learned counsel for the review applicant-petitioner wants to reagitate and reargue the case on merits, which cannot be permitted in a review application. The review application is accordingly dismissed. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed off. 28.01.2026 Yogesh Sharma ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO YOGESH SHARMA 2026.01.29 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh