Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2017 DAILYLAW 3104 (PNJ)

SUMIT SEHGAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/31384/2025 · 2026-02-25

Aman Chaudhary

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1. BNSS for quashing of order dated learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panipat, vide which the petitioner was declared a proclaimed person in case bearing CIS No.NACT 2017, under Section 138 NI Act and FIR No.189 dated 11.03.2019, registered at Police Station Old Industrial, Panipat, un IPC. 2. the said complaint, notice was issued to him at House No.857, Model Town Panipat, address. However as a matter of f on account of the fact that he was residing at House No.557 Town, Panipat, at the relevant time, for which reference is made to copy The present petition has been filed under for quashing of order dated 28.11.2018, Annexure P d Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panipat, vide which the petitioner was declared a proclaimed person in case bearing CIS No.NACT 2017, under Section 138 NI Act and FIR No.189 dated 11.03.2019, registered at Police Station Old Industrial, Panipat, un Learned counsel submits that after having been summoned in the said complaint, notice was issued to him at House No.857, Model Town Panipat, whereafter publication has been effected at the said However as a matter of fact, no notice was ever served upon him on account of the fact that he was residing at House No.557 Town, Panipat, at the relevant time, for which reference is made to copy The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of 28.11.2018, Annexure P-1, passed by d Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panipat, vide which the petitioner was declared a proclaimed person in case bearing CIS No.NACT-707 of 2017, under Section 138 NI Act and FIR No.189 dated 11.03.2019, registered at Police Station Old Industrial, Panipat, under Section 174-A after having been summoned in the said complaint, notice was issued to him at House No.857, Model whereafter publication has been effected at the said no notice was ever served upon him on account of the fact that he was residing at House No.557-R, Model Town, Panipat, at the relevant time, for which reference is made to copy PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.26 19:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-31384-2025 -2- of his passport issued on 14.01.2016. As such, he could not be said to be absconding or evading the process and the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. were not complied with in letter and spirit. Thereafter, the FIR in PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.26 19:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.26 19:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 28.11.2018, Annexure P-1, and FIR No.189 dated 11.03.2019, registered at Police Station Old Industrial, Panipat, under Section 174-A IPC are hereby quashed. 12. 13. The petition is disposed of. 14. Before parting with this order, it is made abundantly clear that in case the petitioner does not adhere to the aforesaid, the present petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed without any reference to this Court. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.26 19:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.