Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 3104 (ALL)

LAL CHANDRA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/57512/2017 · 2026-09-10

Siddharth Nandan

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 57512 of 2017 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. In view of the order of the same date passed in Writ-A No. 11385 of 2026, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous; and without prejudice his rights and contention to be considered in pursuance of the letter dated 09.03.2026 issued by the Director of Education (Secondary) U.P., Lucknow, the present writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, in terms of the prayer made. September 11, 2026 Sumit K. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Balwant Singh, Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sheikh Moazzam Inam, Anil Yadav, Ashutosh Dwivedi, C.S.C. (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Lal Chandra Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad