IN THE HIG 297 Anju Karam Singh & BEFORE: HO Present: - Mr Mr Mr wit NIDHI GUPTA 1. Pre challenge to the Additional Civi filed by the app for setting aside P/1) has been di 2. Lea efforts, the pet petition. 3. A p i.e. on 10.02.20 for the petitione E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA Da Versus ngh & Ors. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate for the Mr. Parveen Kumar with Mr. Rishi Pal Chaudhary, Advocate with respondents in person. UPTA, J. (ORAL) Present revision petition has bee to the order dated 05.04.2017 (Anne l Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Shahabad ( applicant/defendant (petitioner her g aside the ex parte judgment and dec een dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitione e petitioner is not coming forward A perusal of the order sheet reveal .02.2026, in view of the abovesaidsta titioner, fresh notices had been issued t ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6516-2018 Date of Decision:12.03.2026 .…Petitioner .... Respondent IDHI GUPTA the petitioner. vocate for the respondents s been filed by the petitioner layin (Annexure P/4) passed by the learne abad (Markanda), whereby applicatio er herein) under Order 9 Rule 13 CP nd decree dated 13.05.2014 (Annexu etitioner submits that despite his be rward to pursue the present revisio reveals that on the last date of hearin statement made by learned couns ssued to the parties. ndents r laying learned lication 13 CPC nnexure his best revision hearing counsel RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.13 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-6516-2018 4. Lea notice, responde 5. O served, yet she i 6. In petitioner would the present peti petitioner has lo her to contact h the petitioner is 7. Acc prosecution. 12.03.2026 amit Wh Wh 2018 -2 Learned counsel for the responden spondents are present in person. Office report dated 11.03.2026 t she is not coming forward to pursue In view of the aforesaid premise, would be futile exercise. It appears th nt petition before this Court for a pe has lost interest in pursuing the same tact hercosunsel or to engage a new c ner is not seriously interested in pursu Accordingly, the present petitio Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No 2- ondents submits that in response to th shows the petitioner stands du ursue the present petition. emise, issuance of fresh notice to th ears that due to sheer long pendency o r a period of more than 08 years, th same, as no attempt has been made b new counsel. It is, therefore, clear th pursuing the present matter. petition stands dismissed for non ( NIDHIGUPTA ) JUDGE e to the ds duly e to the ency of ars, the ade by lear that r non- RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.13 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.