121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA PARVEEN PARKASH AJOY SHARMA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Rakesh Roy, Advocate Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel on instructions from Dr. Preeti Padda Nodal Officer (Legal) DRME submits that the arrears of pension w.e.f. 01.04.2017 till 30.06.2021 along with difference on account of leave encashment benefit shall be released period of three weeks from today. In v not press the present petition. It may also be noticed here that as regards interest on delayed release of terminal benefits, the petitioner has already remedy by way of filin Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that e erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 05.03.2025 Tejwinder THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: PARVEEN PARKASH Versus AJOY SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Rakesh Roy, Advocate for Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, Advocate Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Dr. Preeti Padda Nodal Officer (Legal) DRME submits that the arrears of pension w.e.f. 01.04.2017 till 30.06.2021 along with difference on account of leave encashment benefit shall be released in favour of the period of three weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. It may also be noticed here that as regards interest on delayed release of terminal benefits, the petitioner has already remedy by way of filing of CWP-4658-2025. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that e erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3965-2023 Date of Decision: March 05, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA for Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Learned State counsel on instructions from Dr. Preeti Padda, Nodal Officer (Legal) DRME submits that the arrears of pension w.e.f. 01.04.2017 till 30.06.2021 along with difference on account of leave in favour of the petitioner within a iew of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does It may also be noticed here that as regards interest on delayed release of terminal benefits, the petitioner has already availed a separate However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2023 March 05, 2025 , Nodal Officer (Legal) DRME submits that the arrears of pension w.e.f. 01.04.2017 till 30.06.2021 along with difference on account of leave petitioner within a iew of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does It may also be noticed here that as regards interest on delayed a separate However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at ventuality, the - as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.03.07 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document