Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 3007 (BOM)

ARCHANA PRASHANT DIKARE v. PRASHANT BABASAHEB DIKARE

MCA/49/2017 · 2026-04-28

Shri Abhay J Mantri

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

911-MCA-49-17.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 49 OF 2017 Archana Prashant Dikare ..APPLICANT VERSUS Prashant Babasaheb Dikare ..RESPONDENT .... CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 28th APRIL, 2026 PER COURT : 1. None appears for the Applicant either in the Court Hall or through V.C. when the matter is called out. Perused the record as well as the status report of H.M.P. No. 1111 of 2016 obtained from the official website of the Court. 2. By this Application, the Applicant has sought transfer of H.M.P. No. 1111 of 2016 from the Court of learned C.J. S.D., Pune to the learned Family Court, Aurangabad. It appears that by order dated 08th March, 2017, this Court stayed the proceeding pending before the learned C.J.S.D., Pune. It also appears that since 21st April, 2017, the Application has been pending for taking steps. By order dated 11th July, 2017, this Court passed a detailed order observing that if the correct address is not furnished within one week, then the matter shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. 1 / 2 2026:BHC-AUG:18930 911-MCA-49-17.odt Again, vide order dated 13th November, 2017, the matter was adjourned as a last chance. Since 30th September, 2022, no one has appeared for the Applicant. Lastly, on 17th April, 2026, none appeared for the Applicant, and therefore, the matter was posted for ‘Dismissal/Passing Orders’. 3. As the Application has been pending since 2017 and by order dated 08th March, 2017, a stay has been granted to the proceeding, it seems that the Applicant is not interested in prosecuting the Application. Only with a view to protracting the proceedings, steps have not been taken to serve the Respondent since 2017. Hence, the Miscellaneous Civil Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim relief is vacated. Inform the order to the concerned Court, i.e. learned C.J.S.D. / Family Court, Pune, accordingly. 4. The Application is disposed of. ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) SSD 2 / 2