Dilwale 1 9-wp-765-17.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 9 WRIT PETITION NO. 765 OF 2017 Fakira Baburao Devhadrao And Others VERSUS The Additional Commissioner Nashik And Others ... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Sonavane Narendra D. AGP for Respondents: Mr. R. B. Dhaware Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. Padalkar Harshad H ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 28.04.2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petitioners are challenging the order dated 30.09.2016 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik in RTS Revision No.47/2016. 3. The petitioners are having an alternate and equally efficacious remedy against the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik, to file a revision before the State Government and this issue is already considered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter “Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani v. State of Maharashtra and Others” reported in 2015 AIR SCW 6277 decided on 06.11.2015. 4. In view of availability of alternate remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition and the same is disposed of accordingly. 5. The petitioner is at liberty to file Second Revision before the State Government within a period of six month from today. 2026:BHC-AUG:19926 Dilwale 2 9-wp-765-17.odt 6. If the petitioner files the Revision within a period of six weeks from today, the delay caused in prosecuting the present petition shall be considered by the State Government while deciding an application for condonation of delay. 7. The State Government is directed to decide the Revision within a period of six months thereafter. 8. The interim relief granted by this Court on 30.01.2017 shall continue till the State Government decides the Second Revision. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE