Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 2979 (BOM)

GANESH DEVIDAS KADAM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/4641/2018 · 2026-02-06

Shri Kishore C Sant, Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) wp655.17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 11 WRIT PETITION NO. 655 OF 2017 KONDIBA THAKAJI RODE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 16 WRIT PETITION NO. 4639 OF 2018 MAHADEV SITARAM BOBADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 17 WRIT PETITION NO. 4640 OF 2018 NAGNATH PANDURANG BODKHE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 18 WRIT PETITION NO. 4641 OF 2018 GANESH DEVIDAS KADAM VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 19 WRIT PETITION NO. 4642 OF 2018 BHARAT AATMARAM DAKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 21 WRIT PETITION NO. 4653 OF 2018 SIDHESHWAR KISAN GHATUL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 905 WRIT PETITION NO. 1092 OF 2017 NAVNATH GANPAT JADHAV VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. P.C. Mayure h/f. Mr. K.U. Shirodkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Saie S. Joshi, AGP & Ms.Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, Addl. G.P. for the respondent-State in respective matters. 2026:BHC-AUG:5453-DB ( 2 ) wp655.17 Mr.V.C. Patil h/f. Mr. U.B. Bondar and Mr. U.S. Mote, Advocate for the Zilla Parishad in respective matter. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. DATE : 06.02.2026 PC :- 01. Since learned Advocate Mr. S.P. Joshi appearing for the petitioners is appointed as Asstt. Government Pleader, his appearance for the petitioners is discharged. 02. Heard learned Advocate Mr. P.C. Mayure h/f. Mr. Shirodkar for the petitioners. These are the petitions filed seeking directions to the Government to absorb the petitioners in service. The petitioners claimed to be working as Gram Rojgar Sevak under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. 03. It is clear that the petitioners were taken only for a particular scheme. No rights have been accrued in their favour to seeks such relief. 04. Considering the above, present Writ Petitions stand dismissed with no order as to costs. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2026/Feb26/wp655.17