1 of 2 71-WP.8813.2017 (modified-2) This order is modified as per speaking to the minutes of order dated 04.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 71 WRIT PETITION NO. 8813 OF 2017 SUNIL JAYKISAN TOTALA AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Pushkar S. Shendurnikar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.6, 7 and 8. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 9th MARCH 2026 P.C.:- 1. After hearing the matter for some time, Mr. Patil, learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that Regular Civil Appeal No.53 of 2024 is presently pending before the District Court, Jalgaon. He further submits that the present proceedings arise out of mutation entries and it is well settled that mutation entries are maintained only for fiscal purposes and do not confer or determine any right, title or interest in the property. The rights of the parties are required to be adjudicated by the competent Civil Court. 2. He therefore submits that since the appeal is pending before the District Court, Jalgaon, appropriate orders may be passed. 3. The mutation entries shall be subject to the outcome of Tauseef 2026:BHC-AUG:33771 2 of 2 71-WP.8813.2017 (modified-2) Regular Civil Appeal No.53 of 2024 pending before the District Court, Jalgaon. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef