Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2017 DAILYLAW 2943 (BOM)
SHRI RAMESH WAMAN BARDE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR OF MARKETING, PUNE AND OTHERS
WP/1282/2017 · 2026-02-27
Nivedita Prakash Mehta, Shri Anil L Pansare
body2017
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 2943 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 2943 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 wp 1282.17.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.1282/2017 (Ramesh V State of Maharashtra and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the petitioner. Mrs. R.V. Sharma, AGP for respondent/State. CORAM : Anil L. Pansare and Nivedita P. Mehta, JJ.
DATE : 27-02-2026. On the previous date, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and, therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal.”
2. Today, when the matter is called out, again none appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (Judge
, J. ) (Judge
, J. ) Deshmukh