Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 2938 (BOM)

ASLAM SHAIKH v. MOHD. JAFAR MAINUDDIN QURESHI AND ANR

APEAL/211/2017 · 2026-02-12

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

134-APEAL-211-2017 .doc Rohit Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. APPEAL NO. 211 OF 2017 Aslam Shaikh … Applicant Versus Mohd. Jafar Mainuddin Qureshi And Anr … Respondent ________________________________________________________ Mr. Santosh Kyadiguppi, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State. ________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 12th FEBRUARY 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file appeal before the learned Sessions Court as per the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran & Etc.1 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the appellant, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty and disposed of. 4. Learned Sessions Court shall consider the delay, if appeal is filed, as the appeal was pending before this Court. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 1 (2005) SC 2099.