LAXMINARAYAN S/O. BANKATLALJI LAHOTI v. UMA W/O. PANDURANG MANTRI AND ANR
APPLN/6407/2017 · 2026-08-19
Criminal Appealbody2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 2913 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 2913 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
6407.17appln (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6407 OF 2017 IN/WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.329 OF 2017 LAXMINARAYAN S/O. BANKATLALJI LAHOTI VERSUS UMA W/O. PANDURANG MANTRI AND ANR ….. Ms Anjali Dube (Bajpai), Advocate for Applicant Mr C. V. Bhadane, APP for Respondent No.2/State …..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026 P. C. :
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6407 OF 2017
1. Heard learned Advocate Ms Dube for the applicant.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 281 days caused in filing criminal revision application.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay is condoned. This Criminal Application is disposed of. 2026:BHC-AUG:37571
6407.17appln (2) CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.329 OF 2017
4. This criminal revision application is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learned APP.
5. The applicant is challenging the order dated 10/11/2016, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in Appeal No. 28/2015 and Criminal Appeal No.07/2016. Both these appeals came to be dismissed. In the said appeals, the appellants had challenged the
order of conviction dated 23/02/2015, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Latur, wherein the present applicant/accused came to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, thereby sentencing him to suffer sentence till rising of Court and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment of three months.
6. Learned Advocate for the applicant fairly states that the applicant had undergone the sentence and paid the fine amount.
7. This Court find that the impugned order is passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Latur in 2015 and the appeal
6407.17appln (3) came to be dismissed in 2016, thereby confirming the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Latur. This matter was listed for the first time before this Court on 12/08/2026 and the same was adjourned today by way of last chance.
8. Today, after hearing the learned Advocate for the applicant, going through the impugned orders passed by the learned Subordinate Courts, and considering the fact that the applicant has already undergone the sentence and paid the fine amount, I am of the opinion that, nothing survives in this revision application. Hence, this criminal revision application is disposed off.
[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk