Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 2901 (BOM)

SUNILKUMAR RAMKUMAR AGARWAL v. SHASHIKANT BASUDEO PASARI AND ORS.

WP/11515/2017 · 2026-07-10

Gauri Godse

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24.WP.11515.2017.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11515 OF 2017 Sunilkumar Ramkumar Agarwal ....Petitioner V/S Shashikant Basudeo Pasari & Ors. ....Respondents Mr. Dharam Sharma i/b. Dharam & Co for the Petitioner. Mr. Samir Kumbhakoni i/b. Ms Nikita Pandey for the Respondent No. 1 Mr. Sanjay Balakrishnan (through VC) for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 Mr. Sachin Chowdhari for the Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 10th JULY 2026 ORDER: 1. This petition is filed by the original defendant no. 5 to the challenge the order passed by the trial Court permitting amendment to the plaint and adding third party as plaintiff no. 4. 2. I do not see any prejudice to the present petitioner in view of the impugned order. It is always open for the petitioner to file his written statement and raise objections on merits. 3. This is not a fit case to exercise the discretionary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to interfere with the impugned order. AKN Page no. 1 of 2 ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2026.07.14 13:55:37 +0530 24.WP.11515.2017.doc 4. The writ petition is dismissed. 5. It is clarified that all rival contentions of the parties on merits are kept open to be decided in the suit. (GAURI GODSE, J.) AKN Page no. 2 of 2