Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 2882 (BOM)

SHAIKH HARUN SHAIKH SAGIR AHEMAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOOD AND DRUGS DEPT, MANTRALAYA AND OTHER

CP/329/2017 · 2026-07-10

Shri Sandipkumar C More, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

329.17CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.329 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1368 OF 2015 SHAIKH HARUN SHAIKH SAGIR AHEMAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHER ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.S.J.Salgare ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 10.07.2026 P.C. : 1] None for the petitioner. 2] The learned AGP pointed out that though this Contempt Petition is filed by the petitioner, challenging the circular dated 06.04.2017 bearing No.344, being contrary to the order passed by this Court dated 04.03.2016 in Criminal Writ Petition no. 1368 of 2015. But, on going through the order dated 04.03.2016, this Court had not passed any specific directions of which the contempt has been made by issuing aforesaid circular. Even the prayer clause-A of the Contempt Petition is also vague and the Petition does not specify as to how the contempt of order of this Court dated 04.03.2016 was made by issuing Circular. 2026:BHC-AUG:27569-DB 329.17CP 2 3] In view of the same, nothing survives in this Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. 4] In view of disposal of main Contempt Petition, Civil Application No.9585 of 2017 also stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC