ao9.17- -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 9 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 861 OF 2017 Shaikh Tajuddin Shaikh Amiruddin VERSUS Sayeeda Begum Shaikh Salauddin And Others ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Patni Pramod F. Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3a To 3e, : Mr. Sk. Allamash Abdul Latif Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Mohsin Khan, ….. AND APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 94 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16459 OF 2016 Shaikh Moinuddin Shaikh Amiruddin And Others VERSUS Sayeeda Begum Shaikh Salauddin And Others ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Saeed S. Shaikh Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Mohsin Khan CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 27th JULY, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Mr. Patni, learned advocate for the appellants and learned advocate for the respondents in appeal from order No. 9 of 2017 pointed out that the matters have been compromised. However, the compromise has to be recorded before the trial court where the suit is pending. Learned advocate for the respondents also submit that the matters have been compromised and the compromise pursis has to ao9.17- -2- be recorded. Learned advocate for the appellants submitted the pursis to that effect alongwith the copy of contents of the compromise, which is taken on record and marked “X” (collectively) for identification. 2. In view of above, appeals from order are disposed of as compromised. 3. Pending civil applications are disposed of. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/