MANOJKUMAR INDRASING PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/115/2017 · 2026-04-28
Shri Abasaheb D Shinde, Shri Sandipkumar C More
Contempt Petitionbody2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 2778 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 2778 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 919 cp 115-17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CONT. PETITION NO. 115 OF 2017 IN WP/4450/2016 MANOJKUMAR INDRASING PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Dhakne Vijay A., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGP for Respondent-State ….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : 28/04/2026
P. C. :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not contacted him and therefore, a possible inference can be drawn that the order has been complied with. The learned AGP confirms that the petitioner has already been reinstated. In view of the same, nothing survives in the contempt petition and it stands
disposed of.
( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
VS Maind/- 2026:BHC-AUG:19086-DB