Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 2741 (BOM)

ARJUN PUNDLIK PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/9158/2017 · 2026-03-04

Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 57 WP 9158-2017.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 57 WRIT PETITION NO. 9158 OF 2017 ARJUN PUNDLIK PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. R.T. Daware h/f. Mr. R.D. Biradar – Advocate for Petitioner Mr. D.R. Korde – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 5, State Mr. P.S. Gaikwad – Advocate for Respondent Nos.6 and 7 … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 04.03.2026 PER COURT : 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and, therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. 2. In view thereof, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. 3. Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale/ 2026:BHC-AUG:10129