1 57 WP 13088-2017.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 57 WRIT PETITION NO. 13088 OF 2017 SMT SUSHILA BHIMRAO GADADE VERSUS THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS … Mr. Sanjay N. Gaikwad h/f. Mr. N.V. Gaware – Advocate for Petitioner Mr. R.B. Dhaware – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. B.T. Bodkhe – Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 7, 9 and 10 … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 27.02.2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petitioner assails the order dated 01.06.2016 passed by respondent No.1 – the Additional Collector, Ahmednagar, in RTS Appeal No. 324 of 2016, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed. 3. Against the said order, the petitioner has an alternate and equally efficacious remedy of filing revision before the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik. 4. In view thereof, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order before the Divisional Commissioner, 2026:BHC-AUG:8902 2 57 WP 13088-2017.odt Nashik Division, Nashik. 6. The petitioner is at liberty to file an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from today. 7. The delay caused in prosecuting the present petition shall be taken into consideration by the Divisional Commissioner while considering an application for condonation of delay. 8. All points are kept open. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale/