Nishant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Amir Subhani, Home Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors
MJC/3419/2017 · 2026-08-19
Girijish Kumar
body2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1943 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1943 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3419 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11478 of 2013 ====================================================== Nishant Kumar son of Sri Binay Kumar Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Kanti Factory Road, Kankarbagh, Near Nala, P.S. Agamkuan, Town and District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through Amir Subhani, Home Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors son of not known to petitioner,
2. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, son of not known to petitioner, District Magistrate, Patna.
3. Manoj Kumar, son of not known to petitioner, District Arma Magistrate, Patna.
4. Pankaj Kumar, son of not known to petitioner, Additional District Magistrate Arms, Patna.
5. Manu Maharaj, son of not known to petitioner, Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG-3 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GIRIJISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 19-08-2026 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. However,
learned counsel for the Opposite Party is present.
2. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party submits that the order dated 21.09.2015 passed in CWJC No. 11478 of 2013 has already been complied with and the Opposite Party No.2 passed a detailed and reasoned order on 13.11.2018 vide Memo No. 4152 i.e. Annexure-E to the show-cause filed by the Opposite Party No. 2 to 5.
Patna High Court MJC No.3419 of 2017(5) dt.19-08-2026 2/2
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the contempt application is dropped.
4. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the reasoned and speaking order passed by the Opposite Party No. 2, then petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same before appropriate forum, in accordance with law, if so advised.
5. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of.
Aman/- (Girijish Kumar, J) U