IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3020 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.349 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Rishidev Kumar and Ors S/o Shankar Prasad Singh R/o Village P.O.- Sakrisaraiya, P.S.- Kurhani, District- Muzaffarpur. 2. Priya Ranjan S/o Vinay Kumar Singh R/o Village- Lasakripur, P.O. Kalwari, P.S. Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. 3. Suddhir @ Sudhir Kumar S/o Ram Shrinagar Pandey, R/o Village- Sadatpur Padarpur, P.O.- Kolhuwa Paigambarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 4. Rajesh Kumar S/o Budhan Pandit R/o Village P.O.- Rupauli, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. Mr. Amir Subhani, the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Government of Biha 3. Sri Amir Subhani, Chairman, Prashasnik Suddar Mission Society, General Administration Department, G 5. Smt Pratima S. Verma Additional Mission Director Bihar Prabhmik Sudhar Mission Society, General Adm 6. Dharmendra Singh, The District Magistrate Cum Chairman Selection Committee, Muzaffarpur. 7. Shushant Kumar, Additional Collector, District- Establishment Department, Muzaffarpur. 8. Md. Kabir, The Dy Collector, District- Establishment Department, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sri Niwas Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GIRIJISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Parties. 2. In compliance of the order dated 17.03.2017 passed Patna High Court MJC No.3020 of 2017(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/2 in CWJC No. 349 of 2017, a reasoned and speaking order has been passed by Opposite Party No. 2 i.e. The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department on 11.07.2017 vide Memo No. 8386 (Annexure-A) to the show-cause. 3. Since the reasoned and speaking order has already been passed by Opposite Party No. 2, this contempt application is dropped. 4. If the petitioner is aggrieved with the reasoned and speaking order passed by the Opposite Party No. 2, then petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same before appropriate forum, in accordance with law, if so advised. 5. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of. aman/- (Girijish Kumar, J) U