Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1835 (PAT)

Asha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through Principle Secretary Primary Education, New Secretariate, Patna and Ors

MJC/262/2018 · 2026-08-18

Alok Kumar

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15940 of 2017 ====================================================== Asha Kumari ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 262 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15940 of 2017 ====================================================== Asha Kumari ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar Through Principle Secretary Primary Education, New Secretariate, Patna and Ors ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7582 of 2019 ====================================================== Asha Kumari @ Asha Devi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15940 of 2017) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kameshwar Kumar -Gp17 (In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 262 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GA-XII (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7582 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Birmani Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Jitendra Kr. Roy 1 (Sc13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 18-08-2026 Ref: C.W.J.C. No. 15940 of 2017 Patna High Court CWJC No.15940 of 2017(5) dt.18-08-2026 2/2 Let this case be listed before the appropriate Bench after obtaining due permission from Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice. Ref: M.J.C No. 262 of 2018 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, whereas learned counsel for the State is present. 2. In view of the Show Cause filed on behalf of the State, wherein stand of the State is that petitioner has been paid admitted salary. 3. Accordingly, with the aforesaid observation, the present contempt application stands disposed of. manish/- (Alok Kumar, J) U