Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1830 (PAT)

Binod Singh and Ors v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./41704/2017 · 2026-08-21

Rana Vikram Singh

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41704 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2013 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Binod Singh, Son of Sita Ram Singh 2. Smt. Poonam Devi, wife of Shambhu Singh 3. Sanjay Kumar, Son of Rajkumar Sah, All residents of village - Chakbara Bakhri, P.S. - Pipra, District - East Champaran. 4. Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kuwar, Son of Chandrama Singh @ Chandrama Kuwar 5. Chandrama Singh @ Chandrama Kuwar, S/o Late Bhagirath Kunwar Both residents of village - Dilawarpur, P.S. - Kesariya, District - East Champaran. 6. Smt. Rubi Devi @ Rubi Devi, Wife of Manoranjan Singh, resident of village - Satjoda Pakadi, P.S. - Panapur, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Parmanand Singh, Son of Late Laxman Singh, resident of village - Chakbara Bakhri, P.S. - Pipra, District - East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 21-08-2026 Mr. Hemant Rai, learned assisting counsel to Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, learned Advocate-on-Record, at the very outset, prays for withdrawal of this application, albeit, with liberty to file an appropriate application before the learned trial Court at an appropriate stage, raising all the issues and the defence which have been taken in the present application. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41704 of 2017(5) dt.21-08-2026 2/2 State is present. 3. The prayer is allowed. 4. If such an application is filed, the learned trial Court shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order positively, without being prejudiced by the present order of this Court, as this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case. 5. This application is, accordingly, disposed off as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. saurabh.kr/- (Rana Vikram Singh, J) U T