Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1740 (PAT)

Binod Kumar Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

MJC/853/2017 · 2026-07-09

Rajiv Roy

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.853 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12111 of 2011 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Jaiswal Son of Late Chitra Narayan Chaudhary, Resident of Mohalla- Panchawati Chowk, Gangjalla, Saharsa, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsah. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura, through the Registrar. 3. The Vice-Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 4. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 5. Khadga Nath Mishra, son of Late Bal Krishna Mishra, Resident of Mohalla- Gautam Nagar, Gangjala, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. 6. Kishore Nath Jha, son of Late Kirhsna Dutta Jha, Resident of Mohalla- Chitragupta Nagar, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. 7. Ranjana Jha, D/o Late Sundar Kant Jha, Resident of Mohalla- Gangjalla, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. 8. Amar Nath Chaudhary, son of Late Kulanand Chaudhary, Resident of Mohalla- Professor Colony, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. 9. Sudhabala, D/o Late Indra Raj Kumar, Resident of Mohalla- Tiwari Tola, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. 10. Kumud Kumari, D/o Sri Surendra Mishra, Resident of Mohalla- Vidyapati Nagar, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. 11. Anjana PAthak, D/o Sri Ram Narayan Mishra, Resident of Mohalla- Naya Bazar, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 09-07-2026 Heard Mr. Vishwas Vijeta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Aditi Sharma, learned counsel representing the B.N. Mandal University as also Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Patna High Court MJC No.853 of 2017(2) dt.09-07-2026 2/2 AC to AAG-15. 2. The present petition has been preferred: “for modification of the part of the order dated 09.05.2016 passed by the Hon’ble Court in CWJC No.12111 of 2011.” 3. Mr. Vishwas Vijeta on the instruction of Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition as it become infructuous with the passage of time. 4. Accordingly, the modification petition stand dismissed as withdrawn. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U