1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO. 15614 OF 2017 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: G.K.YALLOJI S/O. BHOOTHOJI @ PAKKIRAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/AT KAMALAPURA VILLAGE CHANDRAGUTTI HOBLI SORABA TALUK, SHIMOGA – 577 429. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI.SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. OFFICE OF TAHASILDAR AND TALUK EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE SORBA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 429. REPRESENTED BY TAHASILDAR. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAGARA SUB-DIVISION, SAGARA SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 429. ...RESPONDENTS (BY MRS.PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.03.2017 PASSED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEXURE-A ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: 2 ORDER The plea of the petitioner is against the order dated 22.03.2017 passed by respondent No.1- Tahasildar vide Annexure-‘A’. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the impugned order is appealable under Section 49 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Hence, it is inappropriate to entertain this petition. 3. In view of efficacious and alternative remedy available to the petitioners, petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appeal before respondent No.2- Assistant Commissioner. If such an appeal is filed within eight weeks from today, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. SD/- JUDGE TL CT-VR