Manoj Kumar v. The Union Of India, Department Of Human Resource Development Through Its Secretary, Mr. Kewal Kumar
MJC/3353/2017 · 2026-03-12
Rajiv Roy
Contempt Petitionbody2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1677 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 1677 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3353 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15627 of 2017 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar S/o Ram Lakhan Saw, At P.O.- Aliganj, P.S. Chandradeep, District- Jamui, Pin- 811301. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The Union Of India, Department Of Human Resource Development Through Its Secretary, Mr. Kewal Kumar
2. The State of Bihar, through Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old S
3. The Chancellor of the Universities of Bihar, Raj Bhawan, Patna through Mr. Phool Chandra Choudhary,
4. Mr. R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Additional Secretary Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar,
6. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, through its Registrar Dr. N.K. Shastree.
7. Prof. Qamar Ahsan, The Vice- Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumar Brijnandan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - Aag 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 12-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for initiation of Contempt proceedings for willful and disobedience of the order dated 03.11.2017 passed in CWJC No. 15627 of 2017 by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh (as His Lordship
Patna High Court MJC No.3353 of 2017(3) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 then was) by the Contemnors-Opposite Parties.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and as such he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U