Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1672 (KAR)

SUSHILA W/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR v. SHIVANAND S/O YALLAPPA DAYENNAVAR

MFA/101136/2017 · 2026-04-02

Ravi V Hosmani

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH. DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL M.F.A.No.101136 OF 2017 (MV) BETWEEN: 1. SUSHILA W/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR AGE:35 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK DIST:BELAGAVI 2. KUMARI LAXMI D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR AGE:23 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE, R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK DIST:BELAGAVI. 3. KUMARI SAVITA D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR AGE:21 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE R/O:PANJANATTI TAL:GOKAK DIST:BELAGAVI. 4. KUMARI. KAVITA D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR AGE:19 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK DIST:BELAGAVI. 5. KUMARI D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR AGE:17 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK DIST:BELAGAVI. 6. KUMARI RAJASRI D/O BHARMAPPA MALLAPUR AGE:15 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE R/O:PANJANATTI, TAL:GOKAK DIST:BELAGAVI. APPELLANT NO. 5 AND 6 ARE MINORS REP BY MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. BAHUBALI.N.KANABARGI, ADVOCATE) 2 A N D: 1. SHIVANAND S/O YALLAPPA DAYENNAVAR AGE:MAJOR, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O:MOHAREI, TAL:BAILHONGAL, DIST:BELAGAVI. 2. THE MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD FIRST FLOOR, PRABHU BUILDING 1 RAMDEV GALLI, BELGAVI. ... RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.04.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.2116/2013, ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-I AND MEMBER, ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Though this Court passed a peremptory order on 09.10.2017 granting a week’s time to comply the office objections, as per the office endorsement, the office objections have not been complied till today. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE RHR/-