Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1669 (PAT)

Rakesh Kumar Singh v. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Through Its Registrar and Ors

CWJC/18592/2017 · 2026-02-20

Ajit Kumar

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18592 of 2017 ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Singh Son of late Shri Baban Prasad Singh Resident of Village Rani Police Station Rajpur, District Buxar, Presently Posted as Associate Professor, Arbind Mahila College, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Through Its Registrar 2. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, , Gaya. 3. Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 4. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 5. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department New Secretariat, Patna. 6. The Principal B.D. Evening College, Patna. 7. The Principal , Sri Arbind Mahila College, Patna. 8. The Patliputra University through its Registrar, Old Bypass Road, Kankarbagh, Patna- 800020 9. Vice Chancellor, Patliputra University, Old Bypass Road Kankarbagh, Patna- 800020 10. Registrar, Patliputra University Patna, Old bypass Road, Kankarbagh, Patna- 800020 11. The Director Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Priyadarshi Matri Sharan, AC to AAG15 For the PPU : Dr. Anand Kumar, Adv. For Magadh Univ. : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22 20-02-2026 Pursuant to the order dated 02.02.2026 passed in this case, Dr. Anand Kumar, who appears for the Patliputra University, submits that one interlocutory application has been filed being I.A. No. 3 of 2026 in which the compliance order has been appended and, for reference, he has pointed out the document which is appended in the interlocutory application as Patna High Court CWJC No.18592 of 2017(22) dt.20-02-2026 2/2 Annexure-A, which goes to show that the amount to the rune of Rs. 1,81,97,419/- for the period 01.03.2018 to 30.09.2023 has already been transferred through RTGS after due deduction as applicable in law. 2. Since, the compliance has already been made and amount has also been credited in terms of Annexure R/A, nothing survives further for pursuing this case. 3. At this stage, the petitioner seeks liberty to file representation, in case of any grievance which is noticed in relation to calculation. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a liberty to file representation, if any grievance are still to be adjudicated in accordance with law, if so advised. rishi/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U