Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1660 (PAT)

Mostt. Vasamati Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/16815/2017 · 2026-02-27

Rajiv Roy

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16815 of 2017 ====================================================== Mostt. Vasamati Devi wife of Late Gopi Chandra Jaiswal resident of At Hanuman Fatak Buxar, Buxar, Police Station - Buxar, District - Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Collector, Buxar. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Buxar Sadar, District Buxar. 5. The Anchal Adhikari, Buxar, District - Buxar. 6. The Block Development Officer, Buxar, District - Buxar. 7. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Buxar Sadar, District - Buxar. 8. The Officer Incharge, Police Station - Buxar, District - Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pranav Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Kumar Maurya, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 27-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred: for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to deliver/hand over the Possession of the land pertaining to Khesra No.924, Khata No.297, Thana No.330, Mauza-Jaso, measuring area-0.06 Acre which was allotted and settled in favour of petitioner vide Land Case no.07/2015-16 because the husband of the petitioner was a Veteran Freedom Fighter and in his honour Patna High Court CWJC No.16815 of 2017(4) dt.27-02-2026 2/2 the land in question was allotted and settled to the petitioner and to that effect purcha has also been issued in favour of petitioner and petitioner further prays for issuance of any other writ/writs, order/ orders, direction/directions which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner died in the year 2019 and in that background, the heirs be allowed to approach afresh if he/she/they so want. 4. Learned State Counsel has no objection. 5. In that background, granting said liberty, the writ petitioner is disposed of. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U