Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1650 (PAT)

Maya Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

MJC/2652/2017 · 2026-04-23

Rajiv Roy

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2652 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20781 of 2011 ====================================================== Maya Devi, Wife of Shri Jay Krishna Yadav, resident of village – Tola Vidya Nagar, Gram Panchayat – Guriya, Anchal + PS – Triveniganj, District - Supaul; Anganbari Sevika at Centre No 103, Anchal – Triveniganj, District – Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1 The State of Bihar 2 The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna 3 The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna 4 The Director, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, ICDS Directorate, Indira Bhawan, West Boring Canal Road, Patna 5 The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa 6 The District Superintendent of Education, Supaul 7 The District Magistrate -cum- District Officer, Supaul 8 The District Programme Officer, Supaul 9 The Divisional Officer, Triveniganj 10 The Child Development Project Officer, Triveniganj, District - Supaul ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amrit Abhijat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjeet Kumar Singh, AC to AAG VI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 23-04-2026 Heard Mr Amrit Abhijat, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2 This MJC No 2652 of 2017 has been filed for the following reliefs: “… … … for extending the reasonable time by way of modification of order dated 16.12.2011 passed by Hon’ble Mr Justice Navin Sinha (As His Lordship then was) enabling the petitioner to file civil suit before appropriate Court of Civil jurisdiction in compliance of order passed Patna High Court MJC No.2652 of 2017(3) dt.23-04-2026 2/2 by this Hon’ble Court.” 3 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be exploring the remedies available to her under the law on the land including the filing of the suit. 4 This Court has taken note of the order passed by the Writ Court as also the order dated 14.08.2013 passed in Civil Review No 486 of 2012. No further comment is required in the present case which is fit to be consigned. 5 MJC No 2652 of 2017 is disposed of. M.E.H./- (Rajiv Roy, J) U