Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2017 DAILYLAW 1608 (ORI)

MANOJ KU.MOHAPATRA v. COLLECTOR,CUTTACK

WP(C)/4237/2017 · 2026-03-07

Chittaranjan Dash

Writ Petition (Civil)body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.4237 of 2017 Manoj Kumar Mohapatra …. Petitioner Mr. P.N. Pattnaik, Advocate -versus- Collector, Cuttack & others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.B. Mohanty, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 07.03.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2. By means of this application the Petitioner seeks the following prayer:- “it is, therefore prayed that after going through the contention as well as documentary evidence be pleased to admit the writ petition and further be pleased to issue writ in nature of “Mandamus” implement the order passed by the learned Tahasildar, Tangi-Choudwar on 19.9.2016, And any other order or direction to the Tahasidar -Tangi Choudwar to carry out the demarcation of the land in pursuance to the direction vide Annexure-2” 3. It appears from the prayer itself that the matter in question relates to the non-compliance of the direction by the Tahasildar, Tangi Choudwar Tahasil proceeding for the demarcation of the land, which is passed sometime on 19.09.2016. 4. Office has reported defects to have not been removed by the Petitioner though the matter is pending since 2017; even otherwise the matter is of about 10 years old, the cause of action does not survive as on date. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Bijay