Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010009522016 2017:GAU-AS:13852 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/127/2016 LOKENDRA GOGOI and 8 ORS ASSTT. TEACHER, MOHEMARI LP SCHOOL, DHAKUAKHANA, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM 2: SADHANA GOGOI ASSTT. TEACHER HILOIDARI LP SCHOOL DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 3: BINA CHIRING ASSTT. TEACHER DIGHALIBASTI LP SCHOOL DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 4: GITANJALI KONWAR ASSTT. TEACHER MALABARI LP SCHOOL DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 5: HEMAPRABHA BORA ASSTT. TEACHER DHAKUAKHANA TOWN LP SCHOOL DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 6: JUNUMANI BORAH ASSTT. TEACHER Page No.# 2/3 BELUNPARA LP SCHOOL DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 7: DEBAJANI TAMULI ASSTT. TEACHER NAGAR AMKATIA LP SCHOOL DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 8: TANU KONWAR ASSTT. TEACHER HARHICHAPORI LP SCHOOL DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 9: HARI PRASAD BARUAH ASSTT. TEACHER PURANI GOBINDAPUR LP SCHOOL DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSA VERSUS PRITAM SAIKIA and 3 ORS COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:SANJIB KR BHUYAN DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19 3:H. BASUMATARY DY. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 4:R. DOLEY BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR Page No.# 3/3 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.J I BORBHUIYA, MS.A DAS,MR.R ALI,MR.L MOHAN Advocate for the Respondent : MR.N SARMAR-1,2and4, MR.D CHETIA(R- 1-4),MR.D KONWAR(R-3),MR.R MAZUMDAR(R- 1-4) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 16.02.2026 None appears for the petitioners on call. None did represent the petitioners on 22.10.2025. The present application is filed assailing willful and deliberate violation of order dated 06.05.2015, passed in WP(C) No.3293/2013, WP(C) No.4211/2013, WP(C) No.3754/2010 & WP(C) No.5213/2013, whereby the State Respondents were directed to pay the arrear salary to the petitioners. It is submitted by Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents that pursuant to such order, the petitioners along with similarly situated persons were subjected to a screening committee and thereafter, some of the teachers were found to be appointed illegally, some were found to be irregularly appointed and depending upon such finding some of the petitioners were accommodated as tutors with new engagement and thus the aforesaid order is complied with. Taking note of the submission as well as taking note that none appears for the petitioners, the contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant